RND: Annual Report to shareholders
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Rand Mining Limited
- Ticker
- RND
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Western Australia
- Primary commodity
- Unavailable
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Production, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-24 10:16:03 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Rand Mining Limited reported a significant increase in profit after tax for the year ended 30 June 2026, driven by higher gold sales. The company provided an update on its East Kundana Joint Venture (EKJV) production, which included 102,206 ounces of gold from 1.27 million tonnes at 2.51 g/t gold. The annual Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves Statement showed a tonnage increase in resources but a slight decrease in contained gold, while reserves increased in both tonnage and contained gold. Exploration drilling at Seven Mile Hill identified a high-grade gold intercept of 0.9m at 14.98 g/t Au.
Reasoning: Rand Mining Limited reported a strong financial performance with increased profit and gold sales. The updated Mineral Resources show tonnage growth but a slight decrease in contained gold and grade, while Ore Reserves show growth in both tonnage and contained gold. Exploration drilling yielded a high-grade gold intercept, and processing recoveries were high.
Positive factors
- Significant increase in profit after tax
- Overall increase in contained gold in Ore Reserves
- Tonnage growth in Mineral Resources
- High gold recovery in processing
- Discovery of high-grade gold intercept in exploration drilling
Negative factors
- Slight decrease in contained gold in Mineral Resources despite tonnage growth
- Grade decline in Mineral Resources
- Drill intercepts are narrow and true width is not disclosed
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 37
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release explicitly states that samples were analyzed via Photon assaying and 4 acid digestion at Intertek Laboratory.
Evidence · text
“All samples were analysed via Photon assaying for gold, and 4 acid digestion for a full suite analysis of 48 elements. Assaying was conducted at Intertek Laboratory.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The drill results table provides 'Metres' for intercept length but does not state true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“Sample Metres Metres Hole ID Sample ID length From To Au Ag”
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves are prepared in accordance with the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the JORC Code 2012).
Evidence · text
“Evolution Mining Limited, as the manager of the EKJV, prepares the EKJV Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves on an annual basis in accordance with the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the JORC Code 2012).”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: The Annual Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves Statement has been approved by Mr Andrew Hawker, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
Evidence · text
“The Annual Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves Statement is based on, and fairly represents, information and documentation prepared by Mr Andrew Hawker, and the Annual Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves Statement as a whole has been approved by Mr Hawker. Mr Hawker is a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and an independent consultant to Rand Mining Limited.”
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: The document presents an 'Annual Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves Statement' with comparisons to the prior year, indicating a revised estimate for an existing resource.
Evidence · text
“Annual Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves Statement”
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: Mineral Resources increased by 0.23 million tonnes from 1.69 Mt to 1.92 Mt compared to the prior estimate.
Evidence · text
“Comparison with the Mineral Resources at 30 June 2025 (refer table below) shows an increase of 0.23 million tonnes”
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: Mineral Resources average grade decreased from 3.7 g/t Au to 3.2 g/t Au compared to the prior estimate.
Evidence · text
“EKJV and Stockpiles 1.92 3.2 0.20 1.69 3.7 0.20”
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: Mineral Resources showed a decrease of 0.004 million ounces of contained gold despite tonnage growth.
Evidence · text
“Comparison with the Mineral Resources at 30 June 2025 (refer table below) shows an increase of 0.23 million tonnes and a decrease of 0.004 million ounces”
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: Ore Reserves showed an increase of 0.01 million ounces of contained gold compared to the prior estimate.
Evidence · text
“Comparison with the Ore Reserves at 30 June 2025 (refer table below) shows an increase of approximately 0.05 million tonnes and an increase of 0.01 million ounces.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 37. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (36)
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · goldGrade: 1.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- From
- 126.75 m
- To
- 127.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 126.75 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:126.75-127.7
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow gold intercept at a moderate grade, part of a broader exploration program.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“1.81”
Context: 0.95
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · silverGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: AgIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.53
- Grade Unit
- Ag
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- From
- 126.75 m
- To
- 127.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 126.75 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:126.75-127.7
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow silver intercept at a low grade, reported as a byproduct.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.53”
Context: 0.95
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · goldGrade: 1.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 262.4 m
- To
- 263 m
- Intercept Depth
- 262.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:262.4-263
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow gold intercept at a moderate grade, part of a broader exploration program.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“1.92”
Context: 0.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · silverGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: AgIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- Ag
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 262.4 m
- To
- 263 m
- Intercept Depth
- 262.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:262.4-263
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow silver intercept at a low grade, reported as a byproduct.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: 0.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 333.4 m
- To
- 334 m
- Intercept Depth
- 333.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:333.4-334
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow gold intercept at a low grade, part of a broader exploration program.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 0.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · silverGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: AgIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- Ag
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 333.4 m
- To
- 334 m
- Intercept Depth
- 333.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:333.4-334
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow silver intercept at a very low grade, reported as a byproduct.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: 0.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · goldGrade: 2.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 334 m
- To
- 334.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 334 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:334-334.5
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow gold intercept at a moderate grade, part of a broader exploration program.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“2.66”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · silverGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: AgIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- Ag
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 334 m
- To
- 334.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 334 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:334-334.5
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow silver intercept at a low grade, reported as a byproduct.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 334.5 m
- To
- 334.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 334.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:334.5-334.8
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very narrow gold intercept at a very low grade, part of a broader exploration program.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- Very low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 0.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · silverGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: AgIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- Ag
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 334.5 m
- To
- 334.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 334.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:334.5-334.8
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very narrow silver intercept at a very low grade, reported as a byproduct.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- Very low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 0.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 334.8 m
- To
- 335.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 334.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:334.8-335.5
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow gold intercept at a low grade, part of a broader exploration program.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: 0.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · silverGrade: 5.56Grade Unit: AgIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.56
- Grade Unit
- Ag
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 334.8 m
- To
- 335.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 334.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:334.8-335.5
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow silver intercept at a moderate grade, reported as a byproduct.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“5.56”
Context: 0.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · goldGrade: 1.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 351.6 m
- To
- 352 m
- Intercept Depth
- 351.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:351.6-352
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very narrow gold intercept at a moderate grade, part of a broader exploration program.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“1.51”
Context: 0.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · silverGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: AgIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- Ag
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 351.6 m
- To
- 352 m
- Intercept Depth
- 351.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:351.6-352
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very narrow silver intercept at a low grade, reported as a byproduct.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: 0.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · goldGrade: 1.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 363 m
- To
- 363.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 363 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:363-363.9
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow gold intercept at a moderate grade, part of a broader exploration program.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“1.99”
Context: 0.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · silverGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: AgIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- Ag
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 363 m
- To
- 363.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 363 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:363-363.9
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow silver intercept at a low grade, reported as a byproduct.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: 0.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · goldGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 371.5 m
- To
- 372.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 371.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:371.5-372.3
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow gold intercept at a moderate grade, part of a broader exploration program.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“1.34”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · silverGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: AgIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- Ag
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 371.5 m
- To
- 372.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 371.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:371.5-372.3
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow silver intercept at a low grade, reported as a byproduct.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.55”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · goldGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 377.6 m
- To
- 378.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 377.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:377.6-378.4
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow gold intercept at a moderate grade, part of a broader exploration program.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“1.05”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: AgIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- Ag
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 377.6 m
- To
- 378.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 377.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:377.6-378.4
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow silver intercept at a low grade, reported as a byproduct.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 380.6 m
- To
- 381.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 380.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:380.6-381.4
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow gold intercept at a moderate grade, part of a broader exploration program.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · silverGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: AgIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- Ag
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 380.6 m
- To
- 381.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 380.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:380.6-381.4
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow silver intercept at a low grade, reported as a byproduct.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · goldGrade: 14.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.98
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 435 m
- To
- 435.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 435 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:435-435.9
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the highest-grade gold intercept reported, indicating bonanza-grade mineralization over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“14.98”
Context: 0.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · silverGrade: 4.57Grade Unit: AgIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.57
- Grade Unit
- Ag
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 435 m
- To
- 435.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 435 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:435-435.9
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow silver intercept at a moderate grade, reported as a byproduct alongside high-grade gold.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“4.57”
Context: 0.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 435.9 m
- To
- 436.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 435.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:435.9-436.7
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow gold intercept at a low grade, part of a broader exploration program.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · silverGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: AgIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- Ag
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 435.9 m
- To
- 436.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 435.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:435.9-436.7
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow silver intercept at a low grade, reported as a byproduct.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · goldGrade: 1.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 446.4 m
- To
- 447.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 446.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:446.4-447.2
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow gold intercept at a moderate grade, part of a broader exploration program.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“1.49”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · silverGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: AgIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- Ag
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 446.4 m
- To
- 447.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 446.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:446.4-447.2
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow silver intercept at a low grade, reported as a byproduct.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · goldGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.74
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 447.2 m
- To
- 448.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 447.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:447.2-448.5
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow gold intercept at a low grade, part of a broader exploration program.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.74”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · silverGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: AgIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.11
- Grade Unit
- Ag
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 447.2 m
- To
- 448.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 447.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:447.2-448.5
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow silver intercept at a moderate grade, reported as a byproduct.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“1.11”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · goldGrade: 8.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.35 m
- From
- 448.5 m
- To
- 448.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 448.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:448.5-448.85
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very narrow, high-grade gold intercept, indicating localized strong mineralization.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“8.14”
Context: 0.35
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · silverGrade: 3.38Grade Unit: AgIntercept: 0.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.38
- Grade Unit
- Ag
- Intercept
- 0.35 m
- From
- 448.5 m
- To
- 448.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 448.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:448.5-448.85
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very narrow silver intercept at a moderate grade, reported as a byproduct.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“3.38”
Context: 0.35
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.35 m
- From
- 448.85 m
- To
- 449.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 448.85 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:448.85-449.2
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very narrow gold intercept at a very low grade, part of a broader exploration program.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- Very low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 0.35
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · silverGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: AgIntercept: 0.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- Ag
- Intercept
- 0.35 m
- From
- 448.85 m
- To
- 449.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 448.85 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:448.85-449.2
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very narrow silver intercept at a very low grade, reported as a byproduct.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- Very low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: 0.35
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · goldGrade: 1.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 449.2 m
- To
- 449.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 449.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:449.2-449.7
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow gold intercept at a moderate grade, part of a broader exploration program.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“1.83”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
7DD-003Seven Mile Hill · silverGrade: 2.18Grade Unit: AgIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 7DD-003
- Project
- Seven Mile Hill
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia
- Reported Region
- australia
- Ticker
- RND
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.18
- Grade Unit
- Ag
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 449.2 m
- To
- 449.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 449.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 7DD-003:449.2-449.7
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek Laboratory
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow silver intercept at a moderate grade, reported as a byproduct.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“2.18”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Resource Estimates (1)
probableEKJV and Stockpiles · goldTonnes: 410000Grade: 4.34Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 0.06Contained Unit: mozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- EKJV and Stockpiles
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- RND
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- reserve
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Andrew Hawker
- Resource group id
- resource:a6cc1b6d4ba190c7e39d
- Deposit or zone
- Underground
Resource Data
- Category
- probable
- Tonnes
- 410000
- Grade
- 4.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 0.06
- Contained Unit
- moz
- Cutoff Grade
- 3000
- Cutoff Unit
- AUD$/oz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant Probable Reserve for underground gold at a high grade, confirming economic viability for mining.
Positive factors
- Probable Reserve category
- High gold grade for underground
- Economic viability confirmed
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: Underground
Tags used in scoring
Probable Reservepositive
Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.
Why it applies: category is "probable"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.